6 Comments
author

Maybe I'll explore the question of the dangers represented by the banning impulse

Expand full comment
author

You are right their big problem is their lack of legitimacy - which they cannot solve anytime soon

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for your support Don.

Expand full comment

It's weirdly appropriate that as the contemporary Elite continually talk up the 'turnip ghost' of the Far Right and invoke dubious parallels with the 1930's that their response to Populism should be informed by the experiences of interwar Europe. What is startling is that a Liberal political theorists (Lowenstein) could have been so instrumental in his embrace of the same authoritarian methods we would come to associate with Totalitarianism. However the danger that the Elite would start banning parties would come with the problem of how today's Elite could legitimate itself if it's unwilling to engage with growing parts of the electorate. The short term solution of banning populist parties and demonising their support base cannot resolve the problems unchecked migration would bring. It would seem that this would be the response of political exhaustion, and the mark of societies whose ruling elites have lost any positive vision of the future, where citizens are merely a collection of problems to be managed.

Expand full comment
founding

Great historical and political insights. The development of undemocratic politics by the EU bureaucracy shows their inability to defend the Enlightenment project as a principle. In the UK the testing cases are also the call to ban the anti-Israel pro-Palestinian “hate marches” and anti-semitism imagery and chants.

Expand full comment

exellent and important article to inform a strategy for change from below, maybe.

Expand full comment