One can hear many languages in London and near where I live the cafes show Al Jezeera (in Arabic) and signage in English is disappearing. That and other cultural displays show primary loyalties are to a foreign country. This colonisation of the UK is not evenly distributed and so its effects are not uniformly evidenced. I read that there are parts of the UK where English is still a majority language.
But, the moral disarmament promulgated by the middle class is uniformly distributed across the UK through education, which has increasingly taken the form of indoctrination, and school and university graduates have been swelling, and continue to swell, the ranks of this anti-nation infestation of the body politic. Like bacteria in a petri dish the spread becomes exponential. It begins locally and slowly but once a critical mass is achieved the rate of spread rapidly increases until the entire dish is covered. That critical mass of imported people not just loyal to their cultural homelands overseas but hostile to the host country appears to be approaching a critical mass within the next 10 to 20 years. Our moral disarmament is encouraging this. Jesus on the cross may have said 'forgive them Lord for they know not what they do' is not something I feel toward to those who are destroying the culture and traditon of England and rewriting our history.
As Hindus and Muslims fight in Leicester, as Sikhs and Musilms fight in Birmingham, as Turkish and Armenian gangs fight in Tottenham, or Eritrean factions fight each other in south east London, as... as.. the progressive, self-satisfied, comfortable middle class establishment remains in denial over what they have done and appears to be doubling down further through Phillipson's education review and Starmer's and Hermer's cult of obeisance to international law and institutions.
Anerica, thank God, elected a powerful anti-biotic and Vance's speech to the Munich security conference was magnificent. Going by statements on X the closest we have to an anti-biotic (for now) appears to be Rupert Lowe and Robert Jenrick. Neither are in power or near it for another four years. We have to work on our individual immuntiy meanwhile.
In the end it’s the wrong use of the word. We are one race, the human race. Our differences are superficial, ethnic and cultural.
These young people have been told lies to suit a political agenda. Of course there is no excuse for the old Democrat superiority and bigotry that produced the KKK. People are just people. This ‘racism ‘ claim is a cover for poor government policies, the media and the bureaucrats who think we can import dangerous people into western culture and hey presto they will take on our beliefs and culture of live and let live.
Rudi Deutsch's "Long March through the institutions" has achieved, in Europe, every objective he set for it. The neo-Marxists now control the media, the education system, and the civil service. The internet provides a way to bypass the media. But unless the European population generally becomes willing to make the sacrifices (sometimes huge, particularly in places like Germany) involved in withdrawing their children from the state run school systems and educate them themselves at home, there is very little hope of ever undoing the damage.
A timely and thoughtful piece by Frank, the point concerning the expansion of the term ‘Racism’ to provide a new tool of elite control of public discourse is fundamental to how we are governed now. It's useful reading the above article and comparing the response Kier Stramer made to the same survey in The Times. Unsurprisingly Starmer’s response was characterised by its technocratic tone and content– a shopping list of grievances and a shopping list of vague responses aimed at assuaging more than solving the problems. There was certainly no sense of the scale of the problem and no sense of there being a need for more fundamental solutions. Where Starmer did mention history, he drew a superficial parallel between conditions he grew up in 50 years ago: without grasping that we have a much deeper problem today.
Starmer’s invocation of the past was done without acknowledging the cultural and intellectual antecedents of our current condition. It is important to note that the crises of legitimation that were relatively nascent back in the 1970’s have given rise to a new orthodoxy today in which our society has internalised its self-loathing to such an extent that it is actively educating the next generation to act as its official grave diggers, to that extent we ought not to be surprised that the young of our society don’t want to defend the society that nurtured them.
It is unsurprising that given the desire to expunge the past on the part of the elites, and their mechanistic approach to society and its history they cannot appreciate their role in the decay of any attachment to society on the part of the next generation. Looking at the opinions expressed in The Times survey what strikes me is that this is a generation not only characterised by its selfishness or fragility but by its conformism, that it has internalised and repeated the values inculcated into it under the ascendancy of the Technocratic order where the past was uniformly bad (Racist, Sexist, headless of environmental damage), and conflict must be managed out of any system rather than seen as an opportunity. This is a world where the precautionary principle applied to all areas of life and safety is championed over freedom.
Perhaps hope lies not with this generation now, but with this generation as they mature, as they discover that this world has many problems that their education has ignored and others that it has applied solutions that were worse than the problem. The solution may lie in the spell of the official self-loathing starting to break and us having the ability to guide that journey. It is worth considering the speech Vance gave in Munich with its passionate defence of freedom of expression and the challenge that it issued to the Western European elite: ‘what are you fighting for?’.
You are very right Digby. It is the conformism that is key and yet many of these people imagine that they are anything but conformist!!
One can hear many languages in London and near where I live the cafes show Al Jezeera (in Arabic) and signage in English is disappearing. That and other cultural displays show primary loyalties are to a foreign country. This colonisation of the UK is not evenly distributed and so its effects are not uniformly evidenced. I read that there are parts of the UK where English is still a majority language.
But, the moral disarmament promulgated by the middle class is uniformly distributed across the UK through education, which has increasingly taken the form of indoctrination, and school and university graduates have been swelling, and continue to swell, the ranks of this anti-nation infestation of the body politic. Like bacteria in a petri dish the spread becomes exponential. It begins locally and slowly but once a critical mass is achieved the rate of spread rapidly increases until the entire dish is covered. That critical mass of imported people not just loyal to their cultural homelands overseas but hostile to the host country appears to be approaching a critical mass within the next 10 to 20 years. Our moral disarmament is encouraging this. Jesus on the cross may have said 'forgive them Lord for they know not what they do' is not something I feel toward to those who are destroying the culture and traditon of England and rewriting our history.
As Hindus and Muslims fight in Leicester, as Sikhs and Musilms fight in Birmingham, as Turkish and Armenian gangs fight in Tottenham, or Eritrean factions fight each other in south east London, as... as.. the progressive, self-satisfied, comfortable middle class establishment remains in denial over what they have done and appears to be doubling down further through Phillipson's education review and Starmer's and Hermer's cult of obeisance to international law and institutions.
Anerica, thank God, elected a powerful anti-biotic and Vance's speech to the Munich security conference was magnificent. Going by statements on X the closest we have to an anti-biotic (for now) appears to be Rupert Lowe and Robert Jenrick. Neither are in power or near it for another four years. We have to work on our individual immuntiy meanwhile.
In the end it’s the wrong use of the word. We are one race, the human race. Our differences are superficial, ethnic and cultural.
These young people have been told lies to suit a political agenda. Of course there is no excuse for the old Democrat superiority and bigotry that produced the KKK. People are just people. This ‘racism ‘ claim is a cover for poor government policies, the media and the bureaucrats who think we can import dangerous people into western culture and hey presto they will take on our beliefs and culture of live and let live.
Rudi Deutsch's "Long March through the institutions" has achieved, in Europe, every objective he set for it. The neo-Marxists now control the media, the education system, and the civil service. The internet provides a way to bypass the media. But unless the European population generally becomes willing to make the sacrifices (sometimes huge, particularly in places like Germany) involved in withdrawing their children from the state run school systems and educate them themselves at home, there is very little hope of ever undoing the damage.
A timely and thoughtful piece by Frank, the point concerning the expansion of the term ‘Racism’ to provide a new tool of elite control of public discourse is fundamental to how we are governed now. It's useful reading the above article and comparing the response Kier Stramer made to the same survey in The Times. Unsurprisingly Starmer’s response was characterised by its technocratic tone and content– a shopping list of grievances and a shopping list of vague responses aimed at assuaging more than solving the problems. There was certainly no sense of the scale of the problem and no sense of there being a need for more fundamental solutions. Where Starmer did mention history, he drew a superficial parallel between conditions he grew up in 50 years ago: without grasping that we have a much deeper problem today.
Starmer’s invocation of the past was done without acknowledging the cultural and intellectual antecedents of our current condition. It is important to note that the crises of legitimation that were relatively nascent back in the 1970’s have given rise to a new orthodoxy today in which our society has internalised its self-loathing to such an extent that it is actively educating the next generation to act as its official grave diggers, to that extent we ought not to be surprised that the young of our society don’t want to defend the society that nurtured them.
It is unsurprising that given the desire to expunge the past on the part of the elites, and their mechanistic approach to society and its history they cannot appreciate their role in the decay of any attachment to society on the part of the next generation. Looking at the opinions expressed in The Times survey what strikes me is that this is a generation not only characterised by its selfishness or fragility but by its conformism, that it has internalised and repeated the values inculcated into it under the ascendancy of the Technocratic order where the past was uniformly bad (Racist, Sexist, headless of environmental damage), and conflict must be managed out of any system rather than seen as an opportunity. This is a world where the precautionary principle applied to all areas of life and safety is championed over freedom.
Perhaps hope lies not with this generation now, but with this generation as they mature, as they discover that this world has many problems that their education has ignored and others that it has applied solutions that were worse than the problem. The solution may lie in the spell of the official self-loathing starting to break and us having the ability to guide that journey. It is worth considering the speech Vance gave in Munich with its passionate defence of freedom of expression and the challenge that it issued to the Western European elite: ‘what are you fighting for?’.
Excellent piece. "Less and less people" should be "fewer and fewer."
you are right - my illiteracy