Racial Vengeance Is Given A Free Pass In Grooming Gang Britain
A sociological account of the organised sexual violation, degradation and humiliation of British white girls.
Finally, after decades of elite enforced silence, a long overdue debate has erupted on the rape gangs that stalk the streets of far too many towns in the United Kingdom. The interventions of Elon Musk, J.D. Vance, Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch have made it difficult to ignore the depravity of organised grooming gang activity in England
The 2013 sentencing report of the Oxford Grooming gang discussed on X leaves no doubt about the moral depravity of these criminals.
Ever since the turn of the century it was an open secret that in numerous English towns, Asian - principally Pakistani – rape gangs were operating in plain sight of the local police and officialdom. These gangs were given a free pass to carry on with their monstrous crimes because neither the local nor the national elites were prepared to acknowledge the fact that multicultural Britain was in big trouble. Anyone who tried to expose the activities of these so-called grooming gangs and highlight the ethnic origins of the criminals and of the victims was immediately denounce as Islamophobic and racist.
I still remember the vilification of Ann Cryer, Labour MP for Keighley for daring to publicise horrific stories of abuse related to her by a group of seven local mothers in 2003. These women provided Cryer with information about their young daughters who were being abused repeatedly by their Asian ‘boyfriends’. When she tried draw the attention of the public to the staggering scale of these crimes, Cryer was denounced as an Islamophobe and branded as a racist, a liar and a fantasist[i]. Faced with such a ferocity of hatred, Cryer was forced to install a panic button in her own home.
It has been more than two decades ago since a group of multiculturalist entrepreneurs and their collaborators in the media and in the political establishment attempted to shut Cryer down. Since that time any politician who dared to tell it like it is has faced a similar reaction. Even former home secretary Jack Straw was accused of ‘stereotyping’, when he spoke in 2011 of ‘a specific problem which involves Pakistani-heritage men… who target vulnerable, young, white girls’ who they regard as ‘easy meat’[ii].
Last year, the former Tory Home Secretary Suella Braverman sought to call out the many Labour Councils who refused to clamp down on the rape gangs because they did not want to ‘come across as racist’[iii]. She was immediately branded as a Islamophobic and accused of pandering to the ‘far right’ and dog-whistling to racists.
A veritable army of academics, race relations experts and media pontificators have responded to revelations about the hideous behaviour of Asian rape-gangs by arguing that these crimes have nothing to do with their ethnic backgrounds. They have dreamt up ‘facts’ that supposedly suggest that group-based child sexual exploitation offenders are most commonly white. According to their version of events the problem of grooming gangs is invented or inflated by Islamophobic activists. No doubt if they were confronted with pictures of the Oxford gang responsible for the most hideous of crimes their report would make no mention of their ethnic background.
The Convicted Oxford Grooming Gang
So why are these gangs given a free pass to carry on with their hideous exploitation of young girls?
First of all, it is electoral calculations that lead many Labour politicians such as Jess Phillips to betray the victims of the rape gangs. That is why Phillips, the Safeguarding Minister rejected the calls of grooming gang survivors in Oldham, for a government inquiry into the abuse they suffered[iv]. There are numerous reports of Labour politicians ignoring or downplaying the threat posed by these gangs to their communities. As far as they are concerned, they don’t want to do anything that may upset their Muslim constituency.
However, the cowardly behaviour of Labour politicians is more than matched by their Conservative colleagues. Conservative Ministers and politicians have tended to go along with the reassuring noises of multicultural entrepreneurs and have been reluctant to draw attention to the ethnic background of the criminals and of their victims. They too believe that the myth of multicultural harmony must prevail. And they too do not want to be accused of Islamophobia.
Political opportunism coexists with anxiety about the consequences of fully revealing the prevalence and the danger posed by the activities of the grooming gangs. Local officials and the police have opted to ignore the problem because they are worried about their capacity to deal with potential accusations of Islamophobia. They also fear a backlash from the Muslim community and are far from certain about their ability to maintain law and order.
The conspiracy of silence regarding the activities of the grooming gangs is ultimately founded on the belief that their full revelation would unleash a chain of events whose consequences could expose the fragile foundations of multiculturalism.
The sociology of racial vengeance
Most explanations of the phenomenon of grooming-gangs fail to capture what is distinct about this form of inter-community crime. Numerous commentators have drawn attention to the misogynous behaviour of the gang members. Obviously, the behaviour is misogynous, but misogyny alone cannot account for the kind of systematic evil that these men inflict on their victims. Misogyny alone does not lead to the practice of intense group brutality leading to the total dehumanisation of their victims. Nor does it explain why the victims are not just any young girls, but children and teenagers who happen to be white.
Some of my colleagues have argued that what is significant in the grooming gang phenomenon is the question of class. They argue that these predators prey on working class girls who come from relatively poor and underprivileged backgrounds. It is certainly the case that the victims of these gangs come from such backgrounds. No doubt, young girls who come from economically insecure and socially fragmented communities are more prey to the activities of the rape gangs than those who come from stable middle-class homes. However, it is not their class background that interests grooming gangs but their accessibility. And what they are interested in is not just girls but those who happen to be white.
Others have suggested that what is at work is a reaction against the strict sexual mores that prevails in Muslim communities. According to this analysis frustrated Muslim men who are prevented from having sex with women in their own communities are simply taking advantage of the availability of non- Muslim girls. It is likely that men from all traditional backgrounds look for opportunities to have sex with girls/women from communities where sex is not strictly regulated. But looking for sexual partners from a non-Muslim background does not lead to the commitment of horrific crimes of abuse. The vast majority of Muslim men who have sex with women outside their community are simply having sex and not committing a crime. Sexual opportunism should not be confused with the kind activities undertaken by the Oxford rape-gang.
That the rapist-gangs happen to be mainly Pakistani, and their victims white is not an accident. Why? Because these men are not simply motivated by misogyny nor just sexual domination but also by racial vengeance. Indeed, the most distinct feature of the phenomenon of the grooming gangs is its racial dimension. Anyone who is interested in understanding the socio-cultural dynamic at play should listen to the dehumanised language used by members of these gangs and their friends when they discuss the ‘white sluts’ who they dominate.
As far as they are concerned it is through their domination of these ‘white sluts’ that they feel that they have struck a blow against a society and a culture that they despise. Every time they inflict a sordid act of humiliation on a young white girl, they imagine that they got one back against a system that fails to esteem them. It is only when you grasp the motive of racial vengeance that the unrestrained and dehumanised brutality of the Oxford gang becomes understandable. From this perspective the more disgusting the act inflicted on 12- or 13-year-old child the greater the sense of accomplishment. Left to their devices these men would not be averse to emulating the kind of total act of degradation that Hamas inflicted on Israeli women on 7 October.
The sexual exploitation and abuse perpetrated by the rape gangs has little to do with the quest for sexual pleasure or even sex as such. Sexual domination serves as a medium for inflicting vengeance against white society. The refusal to publicly acknowledge that racial dimension of these crimes constitutes a betrayal of the victims. In effect the weakest and most powerless section of British society is sacrificed on the altars of multiculturalism.
Unless we grasp this reality and expose these hideous activities for what they are these criminals will escalate and expand their activities on the streets of England.
But what should really worry us in not only the willingness of groups of men to embrace such extreme forms of morally depraved behaviour but the reaction or the lack of reaction of Britain’s political and cultural institutions to it. As far as they were concerned it was better that the victims of the rape gang accepted their horrible fate than that the public was made aware of some very disturbing inconvenient truths about multicultural Britain. Their shocking response and institutional collusion continues to prevail. But hopefully not for long!
[i] https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/crime/heartbreak-of-mps-lone-battle-to-tackle-sex-abuse-in-bradford-1786145
[ii] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8248189/Jack-Straw-sparks-row-with-Pakistan-easy-meat-remark.html
[iii] https://www.independent.co.uk/independentpremium/uk-news/suella-braverman-labour-grooming-gangs-b2312592.html
[iv] https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/01/02/jess-phillipss-betrayal-of-grooming-gang-victims/
Ann Cryer, Sarah Champion, Maggie Oliver, Suella Braverman, all paid a price for speaking out "...pour encourager les autres" as did some ordinary people such as parents getting arrested for the 'racism' of identifying perpetrators. In one case, where a semi clad underage victim was found drunk in a room with seven Pakistani men, it was the young girl who was arrested for being "drunk and disorderly". The institutional denial and gaslighting of victims beggars befief and is indeed extremely worrying.
Naz Shah MP's retweet in 2017 (albeit deleted quite quickly) that vicitms should shut up for the sake of diversity illustrated in summary form the all too prevalent attitude that cascaded down from elites to foot soldiers with ordinary coppers following the lead so set. Local councillors felt the same way as did, in a slighlty different context, colleagues of an NGO worker in Calais who told a rape vicitim not to report a rape by an immigrant. It is not just the elites' response that is worrying but the extent of the diffusion down the ranks, so to speak, of the omerta to produce what must be the greatest moral indictment of multiculturalism and the diversity mantra in existence.
There are calls for a public enquiry. I doubt that will come to pass and even if it did it would not produce anything meaningful. As with Covid, or the various enquiries in Northen Ireland, they tend to be very long, very expensive ways of avoiding real issues, often dealing with secondary phenonmena as a way of distracting from (intractable) underlying causes, and become a way of kicking cans down the road. Instead, I would like to see a task force whose object was to identify every public office holder - police, councillors and MPs - who knew or could reasonably be expected to have known, what was going on. Prosecutions for malfeasance in public office should then follow and where such prosecutions failed (as many would given the closing of ranks by the establishment though some might suceed if investigators were thorough and brave enough) at least putting these people through the stress of such a process would be some sort of justice. It might even produce evidence enough at the lower civil standard for victims to sue them for compensation. That absolutely no-one involved in the omerta has even lost their job is a huge injustice. Let's have a "...encourager les autres" going the other way. Every policeman, councillor and MP needs to see and feel there will be a price for looking the other way ever again.
One problem is that a DPP with zero prosecutions for rape gangs was in post during the height of the crisis and is now PM. The establishment has every motive to protect him as it will be to protect themselves. Starmer once claimed that prosecutions were for his case workers and so why he knew or did nothing. This defies belief in that if they did not report to him, seek his advice or approval for decisions, if he did not check their work, then he is admitting he was paid for nothing. Perhaps, a member of the DPP's office will one day contradict Starmer's account of his time as DPP. One can dream.
There is I believe such a thing as cultural memory and I suspect it played apart in the working class' disorder in Southport. That cultural memory is being provoked again with the new clamour for a public enquiry. The estabilishment appears to believe it can keep a lid on a pressure cooker for ever. Or, rather, it may be begining to suspect it cannot but has no idea at all of what to do. They are like a soldier suddenly aware he is standing in a minefield who then freezes. How long can this go on?
Most Germans today live under a burden of guilt for the horrific crimes of their government 1933 - 1945, even though there was a partial reckoning at Nuremburg, and few if any responsible are left alive. Yet in Britain these monstrous crimes by the Muslim rape gangs have been ignored by those responsible for protecting against such things, and they remain "respectable" and in power. The response of the establishment to the rape gangs is a terrible stain on the moral character of the country and its citizenry who vote for those responsible.